On 4 May 2006 at 7:46pm Mark rolfe wrote:
How stupid! A 63 year old Lewes doctor is seven months pregnant what is the world comimg to I ask.
On 4 May 2006 at 8:14pm mick wrote:
Yep. That's another fire raising delinquent arsonist on the loose.
Where are the parents?
Oh yeah six feet under.
On 4 May 2006 at 10:20pm Smiler wrote:
Nice!
On 5 May 2006 at 8:49am empty sack wrote:
ITS JUST NOT RIGHT !! messing with nature, shes just doing it as an experiment for her work, so when her child ( freak ) want mum to do the sack race on sports day she wont be able to as she will be down the post office collecting her pension, and wheres her partner, are we going to support this thing, need we highlight more reasons this should not have happened,
On 5 May 2006 at 12:48pm Chav wrote:
63 and still importing foreign meat !! Good on her. Hope my chicks have taken note.
On 5 May 2006 at 4:29pm Brian wrote:
Question, how far will this go?
Will we have 80 year old women wanting babies?
On 5 May 2006 at 7:24pm I dont live in lewes anymore wrote:
One of Chavs chicks for sure...
lol
PhilX
On 5 May 2006 at 10:36pm Brian wrote:
Chav's are never fussed, a mouths a mouth, a holes a hole!
On 6 May 2006 at 8:34am Chav wrote:
Oh hark at Phil the grandad.probably wonders what all the fuss is about. He see's 63 as youthfull.Hope for you yet retirement home boy.
On 7 May 2006 at 2:28pm Northern bigot wrote:
Shes a must for one of this years Tabs! She has made the town a laughing stock! As a Doctor she must surely know the future problems in store! Physician heal thyself!
On 7 May 2006 at 6:44pm ben wrote:
You're all idiots. Fair play to her. The baby will have an amazing life. Leave her alone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On 7 May 2006 at 7:04pm Chav wrote:
As it happens, she aint too bad. I'd give her one.
On 7 May 2006 at 7:24pm Northern Bigot wrote:
Chav is that because she scrubs up well? Or do you normally go for 63 year olds? Do you frequent the Crown on a saturday afternoon?
Ben, i agree the baby will have an "amazing life", both mother and baby can go through incontinence together!
On 8 May 2006 at 12:01pm I dont live in lewes anymore wrote:
Commendation indeed... then again Chav would give anything one.
lol
PhilX
On 8 May 2006 at 9:31pm Chav wrote:
Not you though son. Skirt & breath, yes.
On 10 May 2006 at 1:35am JACK CARTER wrote:
Is it illegal to have children after a certain age?
As for Empty Sack & Mark Rolfe having misgivings, get with it! Any woman still able to have children at the age of 63 is meant to be having children at the age of 63 ... IF SHE WANTS TO. It's not like she's having the baby to get a Council House like ...
On 10 May 2006 at 7:44am mick wrote:
That's the whole point though. She CAN'T have children at that age. Not without dubious scientific help anyway. There is a reason why after a certain time the female body stops the NATURAL birth process.
Just because science has improved and we can now do something doesn't mean we have too.
It is time to draw the line.
On 10 May 2006 at 8:36am The Tooth Fairy wrote:
Oh dear, I knew this day would come sometime. Better get it over with then.
Yes mick, I have to agree with you on this one.
Must go now, starting to feel quite ill.
On 10 May 2006 at 2:36pm Mystic mog wrote:
So many children around the world that need adopting. "Choice" is now more important than morals.
On 10 May 2006 at 4:32pm Chav wrote:
They become forgetful too. My parents were elderly and I came home from school to find they had moved house and forgot to tell me. They even forgot to leave a forwarding address.
On 10 May 2006 at 7:03pm Brian wrote:
Totally agree with Mick.
You mess around with mother nature and you don't know what will happen! Is she just pregnant or did she drop the sprog yet? If she's just preggers how far along is she?
Shouldn't she be reading Miss Marple at her age?
On 12 May 2006 at 4:03pm buster wrote:
I have no right to judge any of you for your opinions but i would say that it is patently obvious one couples measured desciosn to bring a child into the world is a)no-one elses buisness and b) something that is becoming rarer and rarer in this day and age.
May I ask - are any of you going to be responsible for raising this baby? Will their descsion impact on your lives in any way? Are you proud of the fact that you are ridiculing a mother and her baby? (talk about picking on the truely vulnerable).
I know that it is all in good fun, but please remember it is people like you (who just dont seem to give a c**p about other people's feelings) who are making a families life a misery at would should be a happy, exciting and nerve racking time.
In case you are wondering, no i don't know the family, but i do know how i would feel if it was - and underneath it all, i think you all do too - so lets be grown-ups and leave that poor woman and her baby alone now.
On 12 May 2006 at 4:59pm Mark rolfe wrote:
I hear her great great grand daughter is having a baby in Scotlang aged 12.
On 12 May 2006 at 5:24pm Brian wrote:
The concern is that this old mother will die in the next few yers then it will be everyones responsibility to raise her child as no one else will capable.
The tax payer will be digging into his pocket to fund the childs physcologist bill.
So there..............
On 16 May 2006 at 2:28pm buster wrote:
dear god Brian - are you an absolute moron?
If any parent dies, the child does not immediatly get funded by the state - legal guardianship passes onto whoever is named in the will.
Since it would be highly unusual that both parents (it seems we have forgtton that there is also a father involved in this too) would die simultaniously but should that happen i think it would be safe to assume that a well off accademic and physciatrist would have made arrangements (monetry etc) for their child.
I find it very hard to belive that in this day and age we are looking at age as the primary indication of whether someone would be a good parent - everyone bemoans young women getting pregnant, ridicules older women for doing the same - i am just glad i'm not a woman, they can't seem to win....
On 17 May 2006 at 3:02pm oh buster wrote:
you have so missed the point she anit a mother shes a baby machine for a man made baby at that (not made by one man but by men men)