On 9 Aug 2006 at 6:34pm carpet wrote:
It seems to me that if you have a person with the power to censor the input to a web site, this will probably be done according his opinions.
For example if they don't mind swearing but hate racism, they would censor the racist stuff rather than the swearing, or vice versa.
On 9 Aug 2006 at 8:59pm I dont live in lewes anymore wrote:
And your point is?
On 9 Aug 2006 at 10:21pm Chav wrote:
hey carpet, not seen you in a while. been moving another dozen in your council flat?
On 9 Aug 2006 at 11:27pm Brian wrote:
I agree with carpet. Its like saying the moderator only removes stuff if it offends him/her/tf, but if it offends everyone except him/her/tf then its ok to stay....
On 9 Aug 2006 at 11:47pm The Webmaster wrote:
How else can I do it?
Should we have a popular vote on each post to see whether the majority think it should be removed?
It's a possibility and if most people want it I'll see what I can do.
I don't like removing posts but I like the idea of this forum being shut down because of ill advised or offensive posts even less.
In an ideal world posts would not need to be moderated but we don't live in an ideal world and if we did this place wouldn't be as interesting or entertaining as it is.
On 10 Aug 2006 at 6:28am I dont live in lewes anymore wrote:
An ideal world... Seaford
- I like the sound of the word.
It means people can live free, talk free, park free, go or come, buy or sell, be drunk or sober, however they choose.
Some words give you a feeling. Seaford is one of those words that makes me tight in the throat - the same tightness a man gets when his baby takes his first step or his son shaves or makes his first sound like a man.
Some words can give you a feeling that makes your heart warm.
Seaford is one of those words.
On 10 Aug 2006 at 10:49am expat wrote:
Glad you found that place Phil.
On 10 Aug 2006 at 6:25pm Chav wrote:
And its the place you can park your motobility tricycle free of charge and the nurses and psycotherapists are in abundance. The place where the warm smell of urine wafts from the blue rinsers and of course the place where Phil, the oldest swinger in town can wander the streets ih his bell bottoms and tank top. (With supervision).
On 10 Aug 2006 at 8:19pm council bod wrote:
lol you wont park in seaford for much longer, the famous escc have dozens of pay and display meters just been deliverd and they are bound for seaford town centre, and the sea front. the workmen will be planting them over the next few weeks. so maybe you should be lookin for somewhere else to live seaford was a nice place but not for much longer
On 11 Aug 2006 at 7:32am mick wrote:
About time to. Why should all the old duffers in Seaford be allowed to park for free?
On 11 Aug 2006 at 10:23am I dont live in lewes anymore wrote:
Fresh on the back of the astoundingly popular success of the Lewes scheme... Yup! parking is indeed coming to Seaford and Eastbourne.
However, this time unlike Lewes, it doesn't directly effect me(I see all the off road parking charges are being increased. £50 now becoming £70 and for the second car £75 becomes £100).
Speaking selfishly, living on the out skirts of Seaford they have no plans to yellow line my road & if they did I have ample off road parking. When/if parking becomes a problem in Seaford town centre I won't shop there. Parking is free in Sainsbury's and I expect just like Lewes small traders will suffer, BWTF.
Though in no hurry I have justed started to look for another house... this time something with less house and more garden which doesn't flood... doubt if it will be in Lewes.
On 11 Aug 2006 at 10:29am I dont live in lewes anymore wrote:
Chavie... I'm so tempted to post a picture of the extreme torment I have to suffer on a daily basis... but it would only make you more discontent and I doubt if Woolies want their shop window kicked in again.
Anyhowz... me hot tub is ready and waiting...
Now where the fuggs Nursey?
On 11 Aug 2006 at 5:26pm council bod wrote:
be careful where you move to as ALL towns in east sussex will have a parking plan by the year 2010. that includes uckfield crowbrough and hailsham any town with more than a handful of houses will be hit, best to move out of sussex the moon or somewhere cos thats the only safe place well it is at the mo
On 11 Aug 2006 at 8:14pm I dont live in lewes anymore wrote:
Bejaysus Council Bod... though I find myself residing in the land of despair and depravity (so Chav keeps telling me) which brings me ever closer to my brother on the cross... your words are bad news.
Don't fancy the moon (expect Whycherly's has the agency) so guess the next move has to be a small village.
On 12 Aug 2006 at 2:01am lopster wrote:
come live in Lewes - hundreds of houses - more being built all the time - on the flood plain - in the fields - in the town centre (obviously not a centre anymore) - no bus station - rush hour trains only one every 40 minutes - so you will need a car, oh they'll charge you to park your car outside your nice new rabbit hutch - still theres loads of things to do - watch the local footie team (too good for the opposition but not allowed promotion - still the local council (one of many such named things) could always promote a new ground nearby on the waste ground at the back of the uni next to the railway at Falmer - oh no they won't what's left of your Council Tax will be spent on preventing it) - WHAT IS THE POINT aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh - I'm off, what about Bognor - fell in love with Lewes in 1971 on first visit - moved here in 1989 - can't think why, there's always Bonfire I suppose - that's all that's keeping me here now - soon tax that i expect and build houses on all the fire sites I suppose - Lewes is dead Long Live NCP
On 12 Aug 2006 at 11:28am I dont live in lewes anymore wrote:
There there Lopster...
Time for a happy pill mate.
On 12 Aug 2006 at 4:44pm MC wrote:
Webbo wrote: I don't like removing posts but I like the idea of this forum being shut down because of ill advised or offensive posts even less.
The problem is not cencorship, the problem is that the law in the UK holds the owner of the forum (Webbo) reponsable for the comments posted to the forum. Even the ISP hosting the forum can be held reponsable for the content! This is plainly ridiculous and it's about time the UK law caught up with the Internet and stopped treating the medium like it was a book or a magazine.
I have a little hope that the law may get changed if the recent problems between the Nazi Nanny Gina Ford and www.mumsnet.co.uk go to court. See here for more: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/09/gina_ford/
On 26 Sep 2006 at 8:44am FatTonny_x wrote:
How are you?
Please tell to me
Wheere i will can find info with subject diets?
P.S. Thanks u for your answer.
Have a nice day
On 29 Sep 2006 at 10:42pm FatTonny_x wrote:
Sorry for my stupid question
Can you tell to me
Wheere i will can find site about subj weight loss?
P.S. Thanks u 4 your help.
Have a nice day
On 7 Oct 2006 at 10:51pm Green_Monkey23 wrote:
Sorry for your time.... Why i can't see images on this resource?
My Browser is: Opera.