On 5 Mar 2017 at 7:10pm Angry wrote:
Webbo. Please step in. There is a compulsive poster who continuously disrupts threads and is taking over this forum. It gets worse every week. I can't mention his name as I will get censored. There has been much talk recently of the end of this forum. Will he be allowed to bring it down? Webbo please speak.....
On 5 Mar 2017 at 7:15pm Pedro wrote:
He's talking about me again 
On 5 Mar 2017 at 7:33pm The trump of lewes wrote:
He is the trump of lewes. He just keeps shouting!
On 5 Mar 2017 at 8:02pm webbo wrote:
@Angry Just try ignoring him rather than stoking the fire but he's as entitled to his opinion as anyone
On 5 Mar 2017 at 8:45pm Angry wrote:
Is he entitled to drag every thread to his own end and you censor others that criticise him? It's way out of hand
On 5 Mar 2017 at 8:45pm Old gear wrote:
He's a bit like chris evans...
Well he thrives on the aggro he's causing so i for one will try to ignore him.
On 5 Mar 2017 at 10:11pm Zebedee wrote:
A compulsive poster who posts under a single user name? Well, there's a thought. Who can you mean? As far as I can see this forum has a good number of compulsive posters who try their hardest to mess up every thread.... and usually do.
On 5 Mar 2017 at 11:17pm Just a thought ... wrote:
What is this thing called an "official" complaint? Does it have a higher status than a regular complaint? Does just having "a moan" count for anything?
On 6 Mar 2017 at 7:25am Annette Curtin-Twitcher wrote:
Why do some posters insist on making personal attacks on others? If you don't agree with what they post, either debate it or ignore it.
We see it too often on here, and good FMs like Spinster and Southover Queen don't come on here any more because they were subjected to constant sniping and worse.
Play the ball, not the man.
On 6 Mar 2017 at 8:40am Gus wrote:
Do you honestly think this person gives "opinions"? It's more likely he's sniggering at the spanner he delights to throw in the works. He serves no useful purpose and, yes, Webbo took out the previous post in which I criticised this person. I wonder if he will also censor this one.
On 6 Mar 2017 at 9:07am Pedro wrote:
I take absolutely no "delight" from being at the receiving end of personal attacks daily and being vilified by an anonymous small clique.
On 6 Mar 2017 at 9:21am Poor lad wrote:
Just try helping yourself once in a while.
On 6 Mar 2017 at 9:32am Whevs wrote:
I'm always baffled as to why he receives so much vilification. His comments seem as valid as any others.
On 6 Mar 2017 at 9:46am Spike wrote:
I nearly got roped in to being a doper.
On 6 Mar 2017 at 11:58am Milligan wrote:
The Lewes Forum - My part in it's downfall.
On 6 Mar 2017 at 12:11pm Old Monday wrote:
@whevs. Because 1. he promotes the use of an illegal drug and sees nothing wrong in doing so. 2. he accuses folks of being fakes/trolls etc if they challenge him...simple as that.
If you had looked at the Tesco thread, his comments were puerile and made to provoke people which it did. The comments I see have now been removed.
On 6 Mar 2017 at 1:43pm Pedro wrote:
More baseless and heavily biased accusations, brimming with exaggerations. I'm happy to defend my position on every one, but fail to see what good it will do. Challenge my positions/beliefs/opinions without insulting and attacking me personally, and I won't be labelling you with the T word. Other people on this forum manage to do that perfectly well, I don't understand why you can't.
On 6 Mar 2017 at 4:27pm Annette Curtin-Twitcher wrote:
So, "Old Monday", your personal attacks are made because you don't agree with another FM's pov regarding the decriminalisation of cannabis.
Why not debate it like a grown-up, instead of indulging in a puerile vendetta? After all, we're all entitled to have an opinion, and to express it, within certain parameters.
On 6 Mar 2017 at 4:36pm Don Curlywurlyonie wrote:
Whata's thisa vendetta you speak of ?
On 6 Mar 2017 at 4:38pm For the record wrote:
I have no issue with the fellow's views on politics or drug use or anything, I really object to his incredibly self-important style of delivery though and how he insists on using four posts where one would have perfectly sufficed. He's excessively fond of his own voice and doesn't know when to shut up and it's this that derails so many of the threads here. In the traditional sense of the word he's far more a troll than any of the people calling anyone names on here because it's impossible to have a reasonable or succinct conversation once he joins in.
On 6 Mar 2017 at 5:18pm Pedro wrote:
It sounds pretty personal to me. If you have no issue with my opinions/views, then why bring them up as an issue? So now my problem is that I'm basically too verbose?! Well, I guess that beats being called a drug addict, with mental health problems and other personal digs I've received in recent months on here. I think its perfectly obvious that I've not done anything heinous worthy of being banned or even reprimanded, so I don't quite understand why you are still campaigning for it. Seems a bit weak that you're still dwelling on my presence.
On 6 Mar 2017 at 8:21pm Wind your neck in wrote:
Just try winding it in a bit, don't crash threads and I think folk will move on. Its tedious.
On 6 Mar 2017 at 8:39pm Pedro wrote:
Wind your neck in. I'm not the one who needs reforming.
On 6 Mar 2017 at 10:12pm Tom Pain wrote:
I often wonder if southover q.doesnt post anymore because she changed her name to something beginning with P.
On 7 Mar 2017 at 9:56am And again wrote:
Look at yourself, "Everyone else is wrong and needs to change", that's the self-important attitude that winds so many people up. A little give and take goes a long way.
On 7 Mar 2017 at 10:37am Old wallands wrote:
Well you have to admire him in some ways. If i had received as much criticism as he has i would probably have fallen into clinical depression.
On 7 Mar 2017 at 12:28pm Pedro wrote:
I really don't feel the need to compromise and yield to juvenile, anonymous unregistered forum bullies. I also don't take their vile personal attacks as constructive criticism either. I'm not perfect, but at least I don't harass total strangers online with personal abuse.
On 7 Mar 2017 at 12:41pm Do you not think though wrote:
That there must be a reason that people don't like your posts? If it was just one person then sure, chalk it up to personal issues but it's a pretty widely held opinion and whilst you have as much right to post here as anyone, if I were you I'd at least entertain the possibility that there must be an underlying cause to it that isn't just other people being wrong?
On 7 Mar 2017 at 12:52pm Pedro wrote:
I'm not trying to win a popularity contest, and those that wish to ignore me have every right to do so as I do to post. What is against the rules it making personal attacks and harassing people.
I also have no idea, and neither do you, that your opinion on me is a "pretty widely held opinion", due to unregistered usernames. Sure, it could be 15 people curiously pointing out the same "personal issues" that you obsess over, but it could just as easily be one or two individuals who have nothing better to do than hold forum grudges.
On 7 Mar 2017 at 1:02pm Old wallands wrote:
This cant be much fun for you P. I would consider taking a break from posting for a while.
On 7 Mar 2017 at 1:07pm Pedro wrote:
Old wallands. I'm not deterred in the slightest. Sure, some people may have buckled under the personal abuse from bullies, and I wouldn't blame them, but I'm finding the whole thing rather farcical and absurd to let it bother me in a negative way. They picked on the wrong person and whatever their objective is, they will never achieve it! 
On 11 Mar 2017 at 12:32pm pearliegirliestar wrote:
I for one don't care what you've done, or said Pedro, but for pete's sake just change your name as I'm fed up of people moaning about you.