On 14 Aug 2013 at 10:30am owise1 wrote:
Its alot easier just to cut the buggers hands off don't you think?
Check it out here »
On 14 Aug 2013 at 11:45am anti nazi wrote:
Theives? Theives?It's the so called voice of britain trying to disguise himself as a mad mullah.The rubbish spelling is a dead giveaway.Pathetic little sh#t!
On 14 Aug 2013 at 1:16pm voice of britain. wrote:
you aint as clever as you think a.n i dont multi post no need for that silly boy
On 14 Aug 2013 at 3:03pm Priory Ghost wrote:
Any idiot can clear their cookies and change IP address, so I wouldn't brag about it VOB. You need to see a counsellor or a doctor, then you might start to lead a more meaningful life. By the way the Nazis hated gays so why you support them is beyond me.
On 14 Aug 2013 at 3:22pm voice of britain. wrote:
another idiot in priory ghost i dont multi post i say my things under voice of britain. only and why should i be banned please tell me 
On 14 Aug 2013 at 3:29pm voice of britain. wrote:
seems ime the one gettin all the personal abuse for saying my bit and i should be banned ha ha if you dont like my comments dont reply easy as that be strong if you can
On 14 Aug 2013 at 3:53pm Python wrote:
You are NOT the voice of Britain; you are a very silly boy.
On 14 Aug 2013 at 3:55pm voice of britain. wrote:
am i
On 14 Aug 2013 at 3:59pm Anti Nazi wrote:
VOB is to English grammar and spelling what Ian Brady was to childcare.
Both are murderers.
On 14 Aug 2013 at 4:06pm Priory Ghost wrote:
The reason you should be banned is you post racist, offensive and generally unpleasant comments on here, in order to provoke people. This probably makes you feel very important in your otherwise sad life. You need help. You are a sad individual. Get help.
On 14 Aug 2013 at 4:51pm God wrote:
Everybody has a right their opinions !just get over it ! Next!
On 14 Aug 2013 at 5:00pm voice of britain. wrote:
oh dear is that it priory ghost ime hurt
On 14 Aug 2013 at 5:17pm Psychologist wrote:
I suggest moving forward that no-one replies to VOB's childish posts.
On 14 Aug 2013 at 5:32pm voice of britain. wrote:
you cant help yerselfs
On 14 Aug 2013 at 5:35pm That's funny! wrote:
Two psychologists pass each other in the hallway. One says to the other, "Hello!" After they pass, the second says to himself, "I wonder what he *meant* by that?"
On 14 Aug 2013 at 5:37pm Python wrote:
I take issue with the often-used phrase "Get over it". If something is offensive to us, why should we not challenge it? Do we want a society in which those who do know how to behave are bullied into silence by the Gadarene few?
On 14 Aug 2013 at 5:39pm Python wrote:
And while we're about it, it's "thieves". I before E except after C. Simples!
On 14 Aug 2013 at 5:42pm voice of britain. wrote:
On 14 Aug 2013 at 5:44pm voice of britain. wrote:
mummies calling its tea time
On 14 Aug 2013 at 5:55pm Malling mutta wrote:
This post is great well done owise1 for getting everybody talking ! I must say VOB @ AN seem to have such a lovely way with words it's mad me laugh so much keep it up boys !
On 14 Aug 2013 at 5:56pm Extra wrote:
Really! Is this for real?
On 14 Aug 2013 at 6:07pm Annette Curtin-Twitcher wrote:
If everyone ignored the idiotic and offensive VoB, he would soon get fed up and go trolling elsewhere.
On 14 Aug 2013 at 7:24pm voice of britain. wrote:
if everyone ignored ha ha cant you then
On 14 Aug 2013 at 11:38pm Zzz.. wrote:
I'm up for ignoring him. Its not like he's ever had anything to contribute, the sad fatboy.
On 15 Aug 2013 at 9:32am Spelling Police wrote:
On 15 Aug 2013 at 3:03pm Censored wrote:
Annette. It is simple. Webbo should be enforcing the website rules that already exist. This would result in much of what VOB writes being removed. The fact that this is not happening undermines credibility in the notion that there is 'Freedom of Speech, because rather than some kind of overbearing state dissuading many people from having a voice, it is posts like VOB's that censor them instead..
Twitter Facebook etc etc are learning this, especially when individuals use these sites to harass and threaten, such as was recently discussed in the press (and as sadly occurred on this site) Ultimately if not dealt with , the people affected start pressurising advertisers to withdraw and also migrate elsewhere to avoid this rubbish
On 15 Aug 2013 at 3:18pm PG wrote:
I'm amazed he is still allowed to post. Unless of course he knows how to get around a ban (pretty simple).
On 15 Aug 2013 at 3:55pm voice of britain. wrote:
any tips pg
On 15 Aug 2013 at 4:00pm Priory Ghost wrote:
Communications Act 2003: Under section 127 of the act it is an offence to send messages that are "grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character"
The offence occurs whether those targeted actually receive the message or not.
On 15 Aug 2013 at 5:30pm voice of britain. wrote:
ime gonna get life. what a joker you are pg it aint worth the paper its wrote on
On 15 Aug 2013 at 6:15pm I know you wrote:
How is life on the Nevill now?
On 15 Aug 2013 at 10:23pm voice of britain. wrote:
ha ha another one with wrong scent
On 15 Aug 2013 at 10:28pm Kim wrote:
Is that you Keith?
On 16 Aug 2013 at 4:40pm voice of britain. wrote:
is that you kim?
On 18 Aug 2013 at 8:53am voice of reason wrote:
Is that you Adolf?