On 27 Jan 2012 at 3:16pm Dingo wrote:
Paul Newman.Hands down ,no contest, undisputed heavy weight champion of the world.
On 27 Jan 2012 at 3:30pm Sexy Knickers wrote:
Quite agree. Shows no tolerance or understanding of views that do not match with his own. Rather sad really.
On 27 Jan 2012 at 5:17pm Cliffe Hanger wrote:
Why is it that no-one is capable of discussing issues of national politics on this board without getting all emotional about it? In fact, why are we discussing issues of national politics on this board at all?
Dingo. Your labelling Paul Newman the "World's nastiest person" is ludicrous.
Sexy Knickers. I have no idea who the chuff you are. I have not seen you post under that name before. But doubtless you have posted here under other names previously. Let us know what names you have used in the past, and let us decide how "tolerant and understanding" you have been. Not very, I would imagine, from the rather over-excited nature of your post.
On 27 Jan 2012 at 5:24pm huw wrote:
Let's all get on for once.
Trolling and actual abuse tends to get rather boring after a while.
On 27 Jan 2012 at 5:31pm Dave wrote:
Too true Huw, too true.
On 27 Jan 2012 at 5:37pm Clifford wrote:
There's nothing wrong with Paul Newman and I welcome his presence here. Where else can you get the latest barrel-scraping lowest-common-denominator 'line to take' from Tory headquarters almost every day?
On 27 Jan 2012 at 5:48pm Deelite wrote:
I'm happy to see Paul here, even if he is a political arse.
You must come and see my pond Paul.
On 27 Jan 2012 at 6:18pm Mr Forks wrote:
Re Clifford: Daily Mail!
On 27 Jan 2012 at 7:36pm Paul Newman wrote:
Wrong. I am nice ;why only yesterday I can across an elderly woman laden down with luggage and clearly close to fainting. I was able to tell her that if she packed better and stopped imagining any amount of clothes would make her less revolting ,she would have no trouble.
By this act of kindness, I have saved the hideous old crone much future suffering. Mind you was jolly amusing to see her wheezing piteously up the stairs, so I may have been rash. But what the hey ...
On 27 Jan 2012 at 9:21pm padster wrote:
wrong Dingo, get used to it, people have differing opinions, very unfair to start a thread that states the nastiest person in the world, It s not like PN says anything lots of other people from the right wing of politics would say.
On 28 Jan 2012 at 4:06am Dingo wrote:
Have you read the r*cist drivel he is peddling about Scotland and the Scots?Ignorant tw*t!I hope his tongue is in his cheek, but it`s more likely to be in his arse which is where he speaks from most of the time.
On 28 Jan 2012 at 5:57am Englander wrote:
QUOTE} Have you read the r*cist drivel he is peddling about Scotland. Racist ? who o why is this word dragged out at every opportunity. Believe me, the Scots hate us more than we hate them so give it a rest with the race card, it's getting very boring.
On 28 Jan 2012 at 8:14am DFL wrote:
Well, if Paul is the nastiest person in the world, we should all rest easy in our beds at night. Nothing wrong with our Paul, just goes off track now and again...but don't we all ? Pax Vobiscum.
On 28 Jan 2012 at 9:35am bastian wrote:
what was that about stuffing verbascums?
On 28 Jan 2012 at 2:14pm padster wrote:
Dingo, i did not read the thread before so in context i see what you mean by using the term worlds nastiest....thing. You are right that is strong stuff you write paul, and not much in the usual way of statistics to bolster your argument. You rant about brown as scottish raj, is just rubbish , and your views of the scots is indefensible and immature, I am surprised at you, i thought you were more intelligent than that. I have to say if you represent english views of scotland then scotland should leave the union. Free speech is free speech but \Paul that was appalling what you have said.
On 2 Feb 2012 at 12:52am AYATOLLAH HOGMANNY wrote:
Sadly what Paul said was right, no-one gives way for the elderly or disabled any more, as seen by me on a Brighton bus yesterday!!!!