On 21 Sep 2009 at 6:25pm Aunt Fanny wrote:
so I was right Ronny will soon go to the pub for his pint
On 21 Sep 2009 at 8:43pm tom wrote:
good for him . i would buy him a pint
On 21 Sep 2009 at 9:08pm Squidward wrote:
'IF' he had shown some form of remorse then I probably would too but .....
On 21 Sep 2009 at 9:26pm Sherlock wrote:
But why would Biggs want to drink with you?
On 21 Sep 2009 at 10:05pm Tax Payer wrote:
hope he chokes
On 21 Sep 2009 at 11:19pm Spinster Of This Parish wrote:
Throughout life, I have suffered the misfortune of numerous people all claiming to have worked for (or known) the Krays.
What was the impact on unemployment figures when they got "banged up"?
On 22 Sep 2009 at 9:56am Thou Shalt Not wrote:
On 22 Sep 2009 at 10:44am grim reaper wrote:
I've got him on my Celebrity Dead Pool, so he really needs to go by December 31st. Pint or not, I want my 20 points.
On 22 Sep 2009 at 11:26am aunt fanny wrote:
Well there are not many of us who care but he hoodwinked the powers that be once again I would have thought if the hostpital said you havn't got long then thats it . would it not be a comfort if someone really worthy of life had that chance to live
On 22 Sep 2009 at 12:59pm Annette Curtin-Twitcher wrote:
I'm not as hacked off about it as I was about Ernest Saunders or General Pinochet. I think they were far worse, and their crimes affected far more people.
On 22 Sep 2009 at 4:45pm solidarity wrote:
so TOM you would buy this man a pint despite his violent criminal past but according to your post re: Calais, you think it's ok to drag off asylum seekers and send them back to afghanistan - A war zone. Tom, you are a thug.
On 22 Sep 2009 at 5:54pm Spongebob wrote:
"violent criminal past" ??? Hilarious. You need to read up on Biggs, he didn't have the intelligence to be violent. He wasn't exactly the mastermind or the muscles behind the great train robbery was he ?
On 22 Sep 2009 at 6:59pm Sherlock wrote:
Spongebob - So because Biggs wasn't the brightest of the gang he is less of a criminal. What a strange morality you have. Are you sure you're not Tom?
On 22 Sep 2009 at 7:18pm Spongebob wrote:
Never mentioned his criminality, i mentioned his violence (or lack of it) he took part in the robbery and was therefore guilty...read the post sherlock and work it out.
But to dish out 30 year sentances was shocking. Before the robbery, Biggs was a "petty" small time criminal, nothing major. Jesus, there's nonces and rapists and murderers walking free every day....Biggs wasn't exactly a threat to society when he got home was he, although he could run someone over with that mobility scooter couldn't he.
On 22 Sep 2009 at 10:02pm eh? wrote:
Spongeblob, you admitted yet again this week that you enjoy a wind up merchant (and will now claim you didn't) but you clearly do. . Oh and you don't seem to understand how the law worked in the 1960's if not today. Or do you have a law degree we should all know about, with a text book called "Ronnie Biggs:The True Story"
On 23 Sep 2009 at 7:36am Sherlock wrote:
It's for the court to decide on sentences Spongebob, not you. Go back to your 'Great Criminals' book collection.
On 23 Sep 2009 at 9:01am Ltr wrote:
It was more likely to have been a documentary on the Bermuda Triangle Mysteries, and History Channel (with added shark programmmes if you press the red button) Ronnie Biggs: Great Miscarriages of Justice.