On 7 Feb 2015 at 1:30am Tory Party Donor wrote:
Suckers!
On 7 Feb 2015 at 7:51am honest tax payer wrote:
If we didn't, all you work shy lazy spongers would have no money for your white lighting, dope and grotty tracky bottoms. still at least if we all stopped putting in the pot, you would not have to prove you were looking for work because there would be no dole money, you would not have to fake an illness at the docs to get your sick note because there would be no NHS. Total Idiot!!
On 7 Feb 2015 at 1:03pm SOT wrote:
Oh yes brave brave little Ed " Big Companies" should pay more tax hooray hooray magic money Brown might have found down the back of the sofa !
... but hang on, where will that money come from. Let’s say we mug Amazon. Well aside from being a country for whom protectionism is not an option this would imperil the business model and ,guess what, soon the only people who can afford books are the public sector latte sipping parasites in Waterstones. Good work thick Ed, take books from our children !
Now whose next, oh yes those terrible people at Sports Direct with their cheapy Poles on rubbish money ( goes a long way in Warsaw mind you). I`m shocked, shocked .… but we likee the cheap clobber don`t we .Last time I was there I bumped into no less than three parents form Wallands stocking up on Trainers and footy togs. Thanks Ed, we go back to a second mortgage to get our darlings swathed in Adidas. Of course you won`t see Polly Toynbee or Tristan ( Rhyming slang ) Hunt there can`t find the family crest you know.
Yay yahoo … lets get Aldi they shout …..(from Waitrose slurping over Palma Ham and Humus )… oh thanks , I like the discounts , in fact we depend on careful shopping .
That’s the deal, in a competitive industry taxes are paid by consumers . Only when there is a monopoly super normal profit is there anywhere else for it to come from ( its called basic economics ) . In this one useful state function Labour`s record is absolutely awful( see Energy)
So why would a presumably sane person like thick Ed bang on about this chimera, this opiated false promise? Same as ever , so you all forget there is one way to raise revenue, from ordinary people .Every promises they make will be paid by you or borrowed as they run the country into the ground to pay the Unionised state sinecure holders in ‘child-debt vouchers.’
Oh boy that Salmon Milliband Administration is going to be "enjoyable" .Start hating it now mix in anger loathing contempt add a feeling of national betrayal and leave to brew until May .
Drink and enjoy
PS Every word about Labour is true about the baby Alfie`s Greens but without the respect and admiration
On 7 Feb 2015 at 2:08pm Mark wrote:
OMG! I think he's actually gone round the bend. It's true that the take from corporate taxation is not a huge chunk of government revenue but that situation exists because we have astonishingly low rates for corporate taxation in this country and we allow loopholes that allow these MNCs to further swindle us. The NMCs pay proportionately less tax on their pfofits than you or I do. Altering this situation would deprive children of books... really???
On 7 Feb 2015 at 2:26pm Cooper7 wrote:
I paid tax once
On 7 Feb 2015 at 4:59pm Lotus 7 wrote:
Alice Cooper you're a knob
On 7 Feb 2015 at 8:31pm Pork Sword wrote:
Paul, I wish I had so much time to sit here & write such utter & complete rubbish. Oh what fun I would have trying to wind up people with a witless, ill founded one man crusade into the realms of stupidity. With this much time on your hands, let the public know; are you on benefits?
On 7 Feb 2015 at 10:23pm Sussex dim wrote:
leave him alone, he has every right to try and convince plebs I mean the public into voting for lower standards of living. If that means he has to twist facts, perform semantic double flips or lie, what's wrong with that? Just remember, lower standards of living for the majority and subsidising the wealthy is good for the economy. So is greed.
Also, no party has been as accommodating and friendly to this proud nation's pedophiles. So long as they're rich pedophiles of course, the others can hang with benefits claimants, who are ALL fraudsters.
On 7 Feb 2015 at 11:31pm PSOT wrote:
Oh how stupid you all are. If only I could be bothered to respond.
Read the truth and all the facts here
Check it out here »
On 8 Feb 2015 at 2:22am wrote:
I'm with you on this Mark. It's actually quite tragic to see the delusional rants of such a troubled mind. It's as if the internet has become an ersatz empty shopping precinct for those lost souls you used to see talking to themselves and sporadically yelling at imaginary demons.
For christ's sake don't make eye contact, just keep looking at the ground and walk quickly. Let someone else take care of him. We used to have a well funded health service looking after people like him, but some friend of Jimmy Saville (and Peter Hayman and Max Clifford) or other decided it would be better to give them 'care in the community', and put the savings towards a tax break for the wealthy.
Did you know Sword of Truth is how Jonathan Aitkin described the lies he used in his libel case against The Guardian when they exposed his expenses fraud? That Sword of Truth cost him his liberty and political career. People have only ever use that phrase ironically since that disastrously arrogant toff fail. I've tried to warn Paul about this twice, but I suppose he's just in too deep now.
And stop goading him Boris Old Bloke, you're really not helping.
On 8 Feb 2015 at 2:25am wrote:
btw, does anybody know - what's a 'fairy take'?
On 8 Feb 2015 at 2:42am wrote:
Paul - did you start typing 'Paul' before remembering this years user name?
On 8 Feb 2015 at 2:45am wrote:
Nice link to a story about Amanda Holden's lack of bra though, that really..um..illustrates your points
On 12 Feb 2015 at 4:51pm fausto honeywood wrote:
It's all down to the Rothschild and the new world order, I think jimmy saville is floating around somewhere!!