Lewes Forum thread

Go on, tell 'em what you think


Lewes Forum New message

Expenses

8
4
On 29 May 2016 at 7:42pm Al wrote:

Electoral fraud complaint investigated by Sussex Police
24 May 2016
From the section Sussex
BBC Sussex are reporting that electoral skullduggery in Lewes is under scrutiny;
"Allegations of electoral fraud in the 2015 General Election are being investigated by Sussex Police following complaints about the Conservative campaign.
The Liberal Democrats have complained the campaign in the Lewes constituency may have broken election rules.
A police spokesman confirmed an investigation has begun.
Conservative candidate Maria Caulfield beat the sitting Lib Dem MP Norman Baker in last year's election."
It is alleged that expenses incurred locally are not fully declared in accordance with the rules, and treated as a national campaign expense.
5
4
On 29 May 2016 at 10:37pm Eric C wrote:
I always knew she was dirty
7
2
On 29 May 2016 at 10:38pm Sussex Dim wrote:
Letís hope the loyal Conservatives in our legal system find a way around this, we donít want to have to void the results like Tower Hamlets did when Labourite Lutfur Rahman was caught.
Iíd suggest that senior Tories get to work immediately on their threats to ruin the careers of anybody who looks too hard into it.
9
7
On 29 May 2016 at 11:39pm Normans Wisdom wrote:
There should be an immediate by election The Tory floozy wouldn't get back in.
10
2
On 30 May 2016 at 12:13am Maria Cauliflower wrote:
I never did nuffink. They made me do it.Oh heck.Vote Leave or somefink.
4
10
On 30 May 2016 at 9:28am get over it wrote:
Oh dear, Norman Baker supporters club throwing their toys out of the pram yet again.
In case you didn't notice Lib Dems lost big time across most of the South East. The result in Lewes wasn't that close ether. People got fed up with storming Norman and his Lib Democrats prattling endless tripe.
Oh dear, how sad, never mind.
6
1
On 30 May 2016 at 1:07pm Normans Wisdom wrote:
No. We won't just get over it. If someone got in by foul means then it should be investigated.
2
5
On 30 May 2016 at 6:43pm get over it wrote:
Your going to have to dismantle your Norman Baker shrine cos he's retired from politics ( have a look in your Lib Democrats comics)
I sincerely doubt the election results will be declared void - a slap on the wrist perhaps and that will be that.
Norman 's irksome band of worshippers just can't accept their idol has gone. ( It was high time he went anyway !)
5
 
On 30 May 2016 at 8:01pm confused wrote:
This I think I think is part an initial Channel news investigation. There are police forces all over England investigating possible malpractice. It's certainly not just a local affair.
4
1
On 30 May 2016 at 8:15pm Normans Wisdom wrote:
Where did I say get Baker back? Pay more attention please. I just want the useless Tory floozy out.
6
1
On 30 May 2016 at 10:06pm King of Sussex wrote:
If Iím reading this correctly, Tories think that the fraud was only committed as an insurance in case the result was a close one, and we should all forget about it because the margin was high.
And they wonder why theyíre hated so much by decent, honest people.
A Sham democracy.
4
2
On 30 May 2016 at 11:03pm Jeff wrote:
The Lib Dems lost in Lewes because of their national weaknesses, u-turns on student fees, voters outside of the town and the greens.
I'll put a tenner on a Lib Dem resurgence next time we get to vote. It's just a shame Norman who did more in a week than Caulfield has done since she was elected isn't still in the running.
2
1
On 31 May 2016 at 10:13am contender wrote:
Jeff, you're forgetting the elephant in the room. The Labour party, despite its exclusion from the London press gang is continuing to gain ground. It is the only option that now offers decency and integrity.
2
2
On 31 May 2016 at 10:27am get over it wrote:
Wakey wakey Jeff, It's not just about Lewes - "voters outside of the town" are part of the constituency ie parts of Walden, Seaford, Newhaven and lots of villages in between. Obviously your Lib Democrats comics don't mention this..duuuhhh.
We were well overdue for a change and people voted that way. If miracles occur and Lib Dems get in again then hopefully we won't be stuck with another Norman "clone".
 
 
On 31 May 2016 at 10:30am get over it wrote:
Spelling gremlin: Walden should read "Wealden"
3
2
On 31 May 2016 at 12:12pm Baker Reality wrote:
Come on! Norman Baker did a sterling job as a Local MP until he took on a nicely paid cabinet role and backtracked on his principles.
2
 
On 31 May 2016 at 6:37pm Normans Wisdom wrote:
And what has Caulfield done? Answers on the back of a stamp please.
 
2
On 31 May 2016 at 6:57pm Viva Hate wrote:
Nice bit of misogyny, Normans Wisdom. Typical to undermine a woman by calling her a floozy (twice).
1
1
On 31 May 2016 at 11:10pm Normans Wisdom wrote:
Thank you for your continued interest in my posts.
1
 
On 31 May 2016 at 11:51pm king of sussex wrote:
Nice bit of PC gone mad Viva Hate.
Even I can see its being a Tory that makes her a floozy, no more or less than David Cameron is the corporate world's rent boy.
What? -i s that being sexist too??
SOOOOORRRRRRYYY!!!! *plays imaginary miniature violin*
Maybe you can help and tell us what your preferred gender neutral term for a prostitute is.


17 posts left

Your response


You must now log in (or register) to post
Click here to add a link »
Smile
Smile Wink Sad Confused Kiss Favourite Fishing Devil Cool

terms


 

Where did you get that hat 141:143
Where did you get that hat

Once more onto the beach dear fiends.... Nev, I'm not trying to impress or confuse, just saying what I believe, and what I... more
QUOTE OF THE MOMENT
The great thing about the Lewes Forum is it's up to date and lively, you don't have to wait a month to get out of date news
Clarissa