On 10 Oct 2014 at 11:43am nevillman wrote:
It would be nice to think that the reason for the Sussex express is coming out tomorrow instead of today is because they are working on a brilliant expose. Somehow I have my doubts however.
On 10 Oct 2014 at 12:58pm Pooper Scooper wrote:
someone probably just forgot to press 'send' for the copy for page 14, and they can't go ahead without another picture of farmer's market.
On 10 Oct 2014 at 2:38pm Dino wrote:
Sussex express is a great mag, so let's enjoy it!
On 10 Oct 2014 at 3:58pm Local Resident wrote:
except it isn't even a good mag. They are probably waiting for something to happen on here, that they can use, since the Forum is where all the local news happens first.
On 10 Oct 2014 at 5:07pm Tipex wrote:
Half the planet could be fried by a meteor strike and the other half wiped out by the plague and the Express would STILL find a jumble sale to report in its headline.
On 10 Oct 2014 at 5:27pm Xplorer1 wrote:
I believe that when the Titanic went down, the SE headline was "Sussex man drowned at sea".
On 10 Oct 2014 at 7:14pm Sussex Jim wrote:
Are you referring to the Baker Express? He's on almost every page; either in picture or referred to in print. It's like the childrens' book- "Where's Wally?"
On 10 Oct 2014 at 9:31pm Pat hole wrote:
he was standing by a pot hole last week. it would have been better value for the tax payer if instead of wasting time pretending he has ever resolved any issues with potholes, we just paid him the same rate of pay as other road workers, gave him some equipment and got him to fill it in.
On 10 Oct 2014 at 10:23pm Another resident wrote:
Rumour has it that they and the developer had prepared an article about winning planning application to knock down the Old Magistrates Courthouse. SDNPA planning committee didn't approve application, so article had to be rewritten delaying publication.
On 10 Oct 2014 at 10:35pm arthur wrote:
Nevillman, I gather there were distribution problems. The paper was available on Friday at W H Smith in precinct.
On 11 Oct 2014 at 8:37am Arthur Hole wrote:
Alright Pat ? take care there`s potholes everywhere
On 11 Oct 2014 at 2:29pm Arthur Conan Doyle wrote:
The solution is elementary
On 11 Oct 2014 at 7:04pm Realist wrote:
Now the paper is out you will see the artist's illusion of how the new hotel will look. The perspectives are wrong, the pavements are too wide, also the hotel looks small. Compare it with the true elevation picture in link
View the picture »