On 7 Sep 2013 at 7:27am Sceptic wrote:
You have not been on the Forum recently. I hope all is well. Southover Queen.
On 7 Sep 2013 at 9:07am bastian wrote:
Given the way the forum has been going of late maybe they have been wise enough to stop. I will soon.
On 7 Sep 2013 at 9:35am Sceptic wrote:
Rise above them bastion, they should all be back at school now.
On 7 Sep 2013 at 10:28am Annette Curtin-Twitcher wrote:
After the aggravation she got on here, it's hardly surprising she's not been posting. It's also noticeable that the standard of debate has fallen in her absence.
Brixton Belle hasn't been around either.
I hope they both come back, and don't just disappear for ever like Spinster did.
On 7 Sep 2013 at 11:02am Shameless from Lewes wrote:
people come, people go. There was a damn good crowd on here about 5 years ago who even managed to get together for a couple of drinks on a few occasions. We were even graced by webbos presence a couple of times.
On 7 Sep 2013 at 11:24am Archibald Armstrong wrote:
Is it time for a Tea Party for Female Impersonators?
On 7 Sep 2013 at 1:00pm One who knows wrote:
Yes, the spiteful idiots saw her off like they've seen others off before her. Saying that, she does lurk and occasionally post under other pseudonyms, as do other old timers (myself included) who gave up under the venomous onslaught and de-masking by jealous small-minded cretins
On 7 Sep 2013 at 1:42pm Archibald Armstrong wrote:
Lurking in the Undergrowth?
There is something to be said for the use of a regular pseudonym.
Owk It does you a disservice by calling someone or some people
'spiteful idiots, venomous, small-minded cretins' can't you just ignore
the people to whom you refer?
On 7 Sep 2013 at 2:33pm Kettle wrote:
I miss her contributions. The forum is worse without her. Sq, if you're out there, some of the bigger cretins seemed to have moved on now...
On 7 Sep 2013 at 5:00pm brixtonbelle wrote:
I'm still here. I don't post much any more just because I find I've said much of it before!
But I still look at the forum regularly
On 7 Sep 2013 at 5:47pm One who knows wrote:
@Kettle: "can't you just ignore the people to whom you refer?"
Quite hard when they make every thread descend into a mire of childish comment and name calling... and when they out you, as has happened to at least four people here.
Yes, as you say, there is a lot to be said for use of a regular pseudonym (aka registration), and indeed too, the use of regular forum software that keep active threads at the top and alerts you when contributions have been made to threads you are active in. This un-functional forum software actively inhibits threads by not respecting live conversations, limiting the number of posts per thread, and encouraging trolls and simpletons by allowing complete anonymity and non-attribution (or lack of reputation).
On 7 Sep 2013 at 7:08pm Dave wrote:
I like the way this forum works as it means its constantly changing and you can get an instant visual indication of which threads are being participated in most
On 7 Sep 2013 at 7:42pm One who knows wrote:
That's not correct though. It actively stops a thread being participated by limiting the number of posts. Modern forum software gives a much better indication by keeping active threads at the top and not burying them down the page as this one does. You can also configure modern forum software the show a tree view if you want. Most people choose not to view it this way though as it wastes screen real estate and (as with this forum) slows down load time. A number showing number of posts in a thread title is enough. If the thread is active it's at the top, the next active second etc.
On 7 Sep 2013 at 7:51pm bastian wrote:
sq, you are missed by all who have opinions. The day we are unable to express our opinions it will be a dark, dark day. Come back and fight, or "They" will have won...and people like that should never win.
On 8 Sep 2013 at 8:34pm Sussex Jim wrote:
I miss you too, Southover Queen. We used to have some good discussions because of our different political opinions. I have not been posting much recently as I have been enjoying the glorious summer ,from 5.00am till 9.00pm. Not much time left to go online!
On 8 Sep 2013 at 9:16pm Deelite 2 wrote:
I have a feeling she might be close.....
On 9 Sep 2013 at 12:21am Hyena wrote:
Oh how exciting, the suspense is unbearable .
On 9 Sep 2013 at 3:03pm Duncan wrote:
Some people fail to see the obvious, even when it's right in front of their faces... as if she'd 'disappear'.
On 9 Sep 2013 at 6:51pm The Kronik wrote:
Last I heard she was living in a yurt in Barcombe.
On 9 Sep 2013 at 9:57pm Deelite 2 wrote:
Oh Colonic. Do you really think she's the yurt type?
On 10 Sep 2013 at 8:40pm Seamus wrote:
On 10 Sep 2013 at 8:52pm Thursday's Child wrote:
I always thought SQ was a gay man.
On 19 Sep 2013 at 9:32pm one of her victims wrote:
8enetta Adams0n is a nasty piece of work, thatīs for sure.
Why? Because she incites and publishes huge volumes of anti-Irish abuse.