On 9 Mar 2018 at 10:35am Lewes person wrote:
What will they do next? Probably wonít be anything useful
Check it out here »
On 9 Mar 2018 at 10:40am tiger feet wrote:
Why can't people just "get on with it" I don't care if you're black, white, green, blue, gender fluid, gender tap water blah blah effing blah. Bloody sick to the back teeth with this PC brigade now.
On 9 Mar 2018 at 11:14am Curious wrote:
I wonder if you can have a badge saying *oh great one* or maybe *your majesty*. That would be great fun and derail such nonsense. Meanwhile in the real world, nobody looks at badges anyway. I've had one for ages saying God and no one notices, or if they have I've been treated pretty shabily.
On 9 Mar 2018 at 11:54am Thegardener wrote:
Hey there anybody who is involved with this, why donít you ***k **f and concentrate on more worthwhile endeavours.
On 9 Mar 2018 at 12:42pm Offspring wrote:
It's very triggering that people think I should address them at all.Don't they know they are cognitive aggressors, assaulting my right to be ignorant and safe!
On 9 Mar 2018 at 12:49pm Roy Rogers wrote:
Triggering ? WTF ?
On 9 Mar 2018 at 2:47pm Ross wrote:
Some men have a uterus.
On 9 Mar 2018 at 3:12pm P.c john wrote:
thŤy can be called it . because not one or the other . or just have it locked up.
On 9 Mar 2018 at 3:31pm Frank wrote:
Wasn't this triggered because a man with a full beard and unshaven legs went to work in a dress and someone referred to him as "mate" and he objected?
On 9 Mar 2018 at 3:34pm Earl of Lewess wrote:
I identify as a member of the aristocracy even though I'm quite common, so I'm going to ask Brighton and Hove Council to make me a badge asking people to address me as "My Lord".
On 9 Mar 2018 at 4:04pm Pseudo wrote:
What about the 150 troops being deployed to Salisbury to investigate the spy and daughter attempted assassination
On 9 Mar 2018 at 4:41pm Tell me wrote:
Is Ďoi fagí an acceptable way to address a homo ?
On 9 Mar 2018 at 6:05pm @TellMe wrote:
If you can find it on a badge then I guess so
On 9 Mar 2018 at 6:38pm DT wrote:
So on the day we're giving the Saudi's £100m in aid,a few badges is what you're getting excited about as a waste of public money
On 9 Mar 2018 at 8:21pm Embassy filters wrote:
Quite an emotive decision but when you put some thought behind it the outcome is more evident than it previously was. Still all things considered itís money well spent considering what has happened previously.
On 9 Mar 2018 at 8:23pm Players Navy Cut wrote:
WTF you on about ?
On 9 Mar 2018 at 9:34pm Pete2 wrote:
I thought the whole badge issue was bonkers until I read some of the above posts. Now I can see what people who dare to be different are up against.
On 9 Mar 2018 at 10:31pm Sunshine wrote:
There's 'daring to be different' - and then there's just being a massive tool
On 10 Mar 2018 at 7:14am Priapus wrote:
Nothing wrong with being a massive tool.
On 10 Mar 2018 at 8:02am Sensible wrote:
This is illegal. Section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988 makes this an offence. Councils are instructed they "shall not intentionally promote homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting homosexuality". That is the law, plain and simple, although there is an act of parliament apparently repealing this. Why do we not uphold decency?
On 10 Mar 2018 at 8:14am gilbert wrote:
Sensible, section 28 was repealed in 2003. 'Apparently' in this context is a rather devious term to use and 'decency' as used here, just plain wrong.
On 10 Mar 2018 at 8:41am One of a few wrote:
Why must we be forced to cowtow to the mentally ill.
Peterson said it best when he said Identity is a negotiation. Not one single person on this planet has a self image which is the similar to all those projected images.
On 11 Mar 2018 at 5:13pm Clifford wrote:
'I am what I say I am' is of course a legacy of the Thatcherite 'Only I am important'.